Systems and organizations: Theoretical tools, conceptual distinctions and epistemological implications.

In Gianfranco Minati, Mario Abram & Eliano Pessa (eds.), Towards a post-Bertalanffy systemics. Springers. pp. 203-209 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present some system-theoretical notions ─ such as constraint, closure, integration, coordination, etc. ─ which have recently raised a renovated interest and have undergone a deep development, especially in those branches of philosophy of biology characterized by a systemic approach. The im- plications of these notions for the analysis and characterization of self-maintaining organizations will be discussed with the aid of examples taken from models of minimal living systems, and some conceptual distinctions will be provided. In the last part of the paper the epistemic implications of these ideas will be presented.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Knowledge-how and ability.Franck Lihoreau - 2008 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 77 (1):263-305.
Conceptual and Derivation Systems.Jiří Raclavský & Petr Kuchyňka - 2011 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 20 (1-2):159-174.
Living Systems: Autonomy, Autopoiesis and Enaction.Mario Villalobos & Dave Ward - 2015 - Philosophy and Technology 28 (2):225-239.
The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.Steven A. Sloman - 1996 - Psychological Bulletin 119 (1):3-22.
People, Tools, and Agency: Who Is the Kybernetes?H. F. J. Müller - 2005 - Constructivist Foundations 1 (1):35--48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-12-20

Downloads
433 (#42,600)

6 months
58 (#70,558)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Leonardo Bich
University of the Basque Country

Citations of this work

Add more citations