A New Dialogue on Yijing -The Book of Changes in a World of Changes, Instability, Disequilibrium and Turbulence.

Abstract

This paper proposes a reinterpretation of the Chinese worldview on equilibrium/nonequilibrium and yin-yang. Important terminologies and concepts that constitute Yijing have correlative aspects with irreversible thermodynamics and quantum reality- instability, nonlinearity, nonequilibrium and temporality. Ilya Prigogine is a Nobel laureate noted for his contribution to dissipative structures and their role in thermodynamic systems far from equilibrium, complexity and irreversibility. His expressions, as argued in this paper, resonate with the principles in Yijing. Thus, this paper attempts to re-state existing interpretations of Yijing’s ideas with reference to science. Understanding Yijing’s terms and concepts must be contextualised to account for its pervasiveness of temporality and the change process. Otherwise, these cardinal concepts may be misconstrued as a hodgepodge of Eastern traditions with no relevance to modern science. This paper concentrates on the fundamental role of indeterminism in nonlinear systems on classical and quantum levels using Yijing’s conceptual framework. It concludes that the dominant ideas in Yijing and ancient Chinese philosophy resonate with the current scientific belief – the end of certainty. Instability, far-from-equilibrium, irreversibility, probability, bifurcation, and self-organisation are intrinsic properties of nature appearing at all levels, from particle, protein folding, and DNA double helix to cosmological scales. Information is the basis of all changes, and the agency of change is the human (‘ren’) with a consciousness existing in the probability space between heaven (‘tian’) and earth (‘di’). Finally, this paper outlines a modelling approach with the self-organising human in the centre between heaven and earth, representing living systems as discrete dynamical systems presented with binary choices (yin-yang). The interplay of yin and yang lines in a hexagram is thought to reflect the changing dynamics of a given situation, and the interpretation of the hexagram is based on the relationships between the yin and yang lines based on informational availability. In this way, the concepts of yin-yang and information causality are central to Yijing's understanding of change and are clarified in this paper.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The Yijing: A Guide.Joseph A. Adler - 2022 - New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press USA.
The Yijing as a Receptive Text.Keyang Dou - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 9:31-35.
Confucianism Before Confucius: The Yijing and the Rectification of Names.Halla Kim - 2019 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 46 (3-4):161-181.
The primary way: philosophy of Yijing.Zhongying Cheng - 2020 - Albany: SUNY Press. Edited by Robert C. Neville.
The Dilemma Facing Contemporary Research in the Yijing.Liu Zheng - 1993 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 24 (4):47-64.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-02-16

Downloads
515 (#34,332)

6 months
298 (#6,820)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Leong
Charisma University (Alumnus)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references