Can We Model What an Emotion Is? Comment on Suri & Gross

Emotion Review:175407392210896 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Emotion Review, Ahead of Print. The question “what is emotion?” has long been at the core of theoretical debates. The IAC-E is a useful framework for understanding relationships among responses in emotional situations. However, this approach cannot address the nature of emotion. Researchers determine what counts as emotion in the IAC-E, and this decision impacts the relationships detected and inferences made. The assumptions of researchers about emotion change the output. Further, the model is not theoretically agnostic and is best suited to examine emotion perception/knowledge, as in the simulations presented. According to some theories, experienced emotion is qualitatively different than situations that involve perceiving others' emotion or semantic knowledge. Addressing the nature of emotion requires empirical examination of the assumptions made in each theory.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why a Connectionist Perspective on Emotion is Helpful.Gaurav Suri & James J. Gross - forthcoming - Sage Publications: Emotion Review.
Emotion regulation and successful aging.Gaurav Suri & James J. Gross - 2012 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16 (8):409-410.
Do discrete emotions exist?Yang-Ming Huang, Maria Gendron & Lisa Feldman Barrett - 2009 - Philosophical Psychology 22 (4):427-437.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-29

Downloads
16 (#880,136)

6 months
8 (#352,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations