History and Philosophy of Logic 41 (1):16-35 (2019)

Abstract
It is often assumed that Aristotle, Boethius, Chrysippus, and other ancient logicians advocated a connexive conception of implication according to which no proposition entails, or is entailed by, its own negation. Thus Aristotle claimed that the proposition ‘if B is not great, B itself is great […] is impossible’. Similarly, Boethius maintained that two implications of the type ‘If p then r’ and ‘If p then not-r’ are incompatible. Furthermore, Chrysippus proclaimed a conditional to be ‘sound when the contradictory of its consequent is incompatible with its antecedent’, a view which, in the opinion of S. McCall, entails the aforementioned theses of Aristotle and Boethius. Now a critical examination of the historical sources shows that the ancient logicians most likely meant their theses as applicable only to ‘normal’ conditionals with antecedents which are not self-contradictory. The corresponding restrictions of Aristotle’s and Boethius’ theses to such self-consistent antecedents, however, turn out to be theorems of ordinary modal logic and thus don’t give rise to any non-classical system of genuinely connexive logic,
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/01445340.2019.1650610
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,579
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Development of Logic.William Calvert Kneale & Martha Kneale - 1962 - Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
The Complete Works of Aristotle. The Revised Oxford Translation.Jonathan Barnes - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 176 (4):493-494.
A History of Formal Logic.I. M. Bocheński & Ivo Thomas - 1961 - Science and Society 27 (4):492-494.
The Traditional Square of Opposition.Terence Parsons - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Connexive Logic.Heinrich Wansing - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Kilwardby's 55th Lesson.Wolfgang Lenzen - forthcoming - Logic and Logical Philosophy:1.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Connexive Extensions of Regular Conditional Logic.Yale Weiss - 2019 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 28 (3):611-627.
Strong Connexivity.Andreas Kapsner - 2012 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):141-145.
Contenability and the Logic of Consequential Implication.Claudio Pizzi - 2004 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 12 (6):561-579.
Realism and Nominalism in Formal Logic.Bruce Erwin Ruy Thompson - 1988 - Dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder
Connexive Implication.Storrs Mccall - 1966 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (3):415-433.
Logics of Nonsense and Parry Systems.Thomas Macaulay Ferguson - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 44 (1):65-80.
Negation as Cancellation, Connexive Logic, and qLPm.Heinrich Wansing - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Logic 15 (2):476-488.
Connexive Class Logic.Storrs McCall - 1967 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (1):83-90.
A Poly-Connexive Logic.Nissim Francez - forthcoming - Logic and Logical Philosophy:1.
Connexive Logic.Michael Astroh - 1999 - Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 4:31-72.
Connexive Conditional Logic. Part I.Heinrich Wansing & Matthias Unterhuber - forthcoming - Logic and Logical Philosophy:1.
Connexive Gentzen.S. McCall - 2014 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 22 (6):964-981.
Dialogical Connexive Logic.Shahid Rahman & Helge Rückert - 2001 - Synthese 127 (1-2):105-139.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-08-20

Total views
13 ( #753,147 of 2,461,844 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #298,852 of 2,461,844 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes