Philosophia 35 (1):43-62 (2007)
AbstractThis article compares the views of Foot and Aristotle on virtues and flourishing. It is argued that the view put forward in Philippa Foot’s recent book, Natural Goodness, suffers from a certain sort of vagueness and it is open to other criticisms which the Aristotelian view can avoid. Foot’s views have been subjected to criticism in the recent literature by David Copp and David Sobel. These criticisms are given consideration in the article and it is argued that the more traditional Aristotelian view advocated by the author will have the means to answer some of these criticisms whereas Foot’s view will not.
Similar books and articles
Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy.Philippa Foot - 1978 - Oxford University Press.
The Grammar of Goodness: An Interview with Philippa Foot.Alex Voorhoeve - 2003 - Harvard Review of Philosophy 11:32-44.
Full Human Flourishing: The Place of the Various Virtues in the Quest for Happiness in Aristotle’s Ethics.Mark K. Spencer - 2007 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81:193-204.
Virtues and Reasons: Philippa Foot and Moral Theory: Essays in Honour of Philippa Foot.Rosalind Hursthouse, Gavin Lawrence & Warren Quinn (eds.) - 1995 - Oxford University Press.
Moral Dilemmas and Other Topics in Moral Philosophy.Philippa Foot - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Good Reasons and Natural Ends: Rosalind Hursthouse's Hermeneutical Naturalism.Sascha Settegast - 2020 - In Martin Hähnel (ed.), Aristotelian Naturalism: A Research Companion. Springer. pp. 195-207.
Gute Gründe Und Natürliche Zwecke: Rosalind Hursthouses Beitrag Zum Ethischen Naturalismus.Sascha Settegast - 2017 - In Martin Hähnel (ed.), Aristotelischer Naturalismus. Springer. pp. 173-183.
References found in this work
Morality and Virtue: An Assessment of Some Recent Work in Virtue Ethics.David Copp & David Sobel - 2004 - Ethics 114 (3):514-554.