Capability and Learning to Choose

Studies in Philosophy and Education 28 (5):449-460 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Capability Approach is in the first place an approach to the evaluation of individual well-being and social welfare. Many disciplines refer to the CA, first and foremost welfare economics, development studies and political philosophy. Educational theory was not among the first disciplines that took notice of the CA, but has a rising interest in it. This paper argues that the CA would also profit from looking into educational theory. The first part of the paper shows why and where educational theory—or more precisely: a theory of learning—is missing in the CA. This is done in three steps: the first section gives a brief overview of the core concepts of Sen’s CA. Section “Capability and Choosing” focuses on the role of choosing in the CA. It states the views of Sen and Nussbaum on choosing and shows the shortcomings in their appreciation of choosing. In consequence, the third section derives some demands on a theory of learning in the CA. The second part of the paper presents Dewey’s educational theory on experience as a possible starting point when looking for a learning theory that lends itself to the integration in the CA. Section “Opportunity of Choosing, Experience and Education” introduces Dewey’s conception of experience, freedom of the learner, conditions of experience and education. Section “Capability and Experience” discusses how Dewey’s concepts fit into the CA. On the first glance, there are three points in which the CA and Dewey’s concepts match: the importance of freedom for human life, the role of participation in education and the need to take internal and external factors as well as their interaction into account in assessing choice situations. This establishes a basis for linking both theories. Yet, more research is needed to explore the issue further. Section “Conclusion and Outlook” concludes and sketches the lines for future research.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Critical Capability Pedagogies and University Education.Melanie Walker - 2010 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (8):898-917.
Rights, goals, and capabilities.Martin van Hees - 2013 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12 (3):247-259.
Truth and the capability of learning.Geoffrey Hinchliffe - 2007 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 41 (2):221–232.
The Sen of Inequality.Andrew Askland - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Research 23:399-415.
Civic phronēsis.Molly Harkirat Mann - 2013 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (1):21-43.
Animal consciousness: What matters and why?Daniel C. Dennett - 1995 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 62:691-710.
Action planning supplements mirror systems in language evolution.Bruce Bridgeman - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):129-130.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-28

Downloads
35 (#445,257)

6 months
8 (#342,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Capability and habit.Matthias Kramm - 2019 - Journal of Global Ethics 15 (2):183-192.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Experience and education.John Dewey - 1938 - West Lafayette, Ind.: Kappa Delta Pi.
Inequality Reexamined.Amartya Sen - 1927 - Oxford University Press UK.
Commodities and Capabilities.Amartya Sen - 1985 - Oxford University Press India.
Inequality Reexamined.John Roemer & Amartya Sen - 1994 - Philosophical Review 103 (3):554.

View all 11 references / Add more references