WikiSilo: A Self-organizing, Crowd Sourcing System for Interdisciplinary Science [Supporting Paper]

, &

Abstract

WikiSilo is a tool for theorizing across interdisciplinary fields such as Cognitive Science, and provides a vocabulary for talking about the problems of doing so. It can be used to demonstrate that a particular cognitive theory is complete and coherent at multiple levels of discourse, and commensurable with and relevant to a wider domain of cognition. WikiSilo is also a minimalist theory and methodology for effectively doing science. WikiSilo is simultaneously similar to and distinct, as well as integrated and separated from Wikipedia™. This paper will introduce the advantages of WikiSilo for use in the Cognitive Sciences.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

Cognitive? Science?J. Ignacio Serrano, M. Dolores del Castillo & Manuel Carretero - 2014 - Foundations of Science 19 (2):115-131.
Philosophy 
of 
the 
Cognitive 
Sciences.William Bechtel & Mitchell Herschbach - 2010-01-04 - In Fritz Allhoff (ed.), Philosophies of the Sciences. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 239--261.
Being Interdisciplinary: Trading Zones in Cognitive Science.Paul Thagard - unknown
What makes interdisciplinarity difficult? Some consequences of domain specificity in interdisciplinary practice.Miles MacLeod - 2018 - Synthese 195 (2):697-720.
An organizing model for recent cognitive science work on the self.Ben Pageler - 2016 - Consciousness and Cognition 45:37-46.
D. Peterson, ed., forms of representation: An interdisciplinary theme for cognitive science. [REVIEW]Han Reichgelt - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (3):455-457.
How to Build a Theory in Cognitive Science.Valerie Gray Hardcastle - 1996 - SUNY Press.
Book review of T h e embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. [REVIEW]Daniel C. Dennett - 1993 - American Journal of Psychology 106 (1):121-126.
Sourcing ethics in the textile sector: The case of c&a.Johan J. Graafland - 2002 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 11 (3):282–294.
Rethinking crowd violence: Self-categorization theory and the woodstock 1999 riot.Stephen Vider - 2004 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34 (2):141–166.
Themes and schemes: A philosophical approach to interdisciplinary science teaching.Trace Jordan - 1989 - Synthese 80 (1):63--79.
History of Science as Interdisciplinary Education in American Colleges: Its Origins, Advantages, and Pitfalls.Paula Viterbo - 2007 - Journal of Research Practice 3 (2):Article M16.
Review of F. Varela, E. Thompson and E. Rosch, The Embodied Mind. [REVIEW]Daniel C. Dennett - 1993 - American Journal of Psychology 106:121-126.
Interdisciplinarity in Philosophy of Science.Marie I. Kaiser, Maria Kronfeldner & Robert Meunier - 2014 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 45 (1):59-70.
Expertise in Interdisciplinary Science and EDucation.Mads Goddiksen & Hanne Andersen - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-14

Downloads
273 (#71,578)

6 months
75 (#58,160)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Pierre Leibovitz
Carleton University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.David Bohm - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (57):377-379.

View all 9 references / Add more references