What Did the Romans Know?: An Inquiry Into Science and Worldmaking

University of Chicago Press (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Lehoux contends that even though many of the Romans' views about the natural world have no place in modern science--the umbrella-footed monsters and dog-headed people that roamed the earth and the stars that foretold human destinies--their ...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

9780226471143   0226471144   022614321X   0226092739
View all bargains

Buy this book

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

What Did the Romans Know? An Inquiry into Science and Worldmaking by Daryn Lehoux (review).John M. Oksanish - 2013 - American Journal of Philology 134 (2):343-347.
What Did the Romans Know? An Inquiry into Science and Worldmaking.David E. Hahm - 2015 - Annals of Science 72 (1):134-137.
Preaching Romans Today.Thomas G. Long - 2004 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 58 (3):265-275.
Worldmaking Made Hard.Michael Devitt - 2006 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):3-25.
Crossing the Rhine: Germany during the Early Principate.Leah Brochu - 2013 - Constellations (University of Alberta Student Journal) 4 (1).
The Romans Donald Dudley: The Romans. Pp. xxiv+316. 33 plates, 5 maps. London: Hutchinson, 1970. Cloth, £3.R. M. Ogilvie - 1972 - The Classical Review 22 (02):250-252.
Starting from scratch: Making worlds. [REVIEW]R. Schwartz - 2000 - Erkenntnis 52 (2):151-159.
Rome and the Romans Rome and, the Romans. A Survey and Interpretation. By Grant Showerman. Pp. xxii + 463; maps and illustrations. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1931. Cloth, 21s. net. [REVIEW]W. E. Heitland - 1932 - The Classical Review 46 (02):69-70.
Greek Science, the Romans and the Middle Ages.A. Wasserstein - 1965 - History of Science 4 (1):129.
The Dialectic of Monotheism: St. Paul's “Letter to the Romans”.Aryeh Botwinick - 2008 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2008 (143):113-132.
Romans and Blacks Lloyd A. Thompson: Romans and Blacks. Pp. xii + 253. London and Oklahoma: Routledge/Oklahoma University Press, 1989. £25. [REVIEW]Jane F. Gardner - 1990 - The Classical Review 40 (02):395-397.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-04

Downloads
10 (#1,129,009)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daryn Lehoux
Queen's University

Citations of this work

The politics of environments before the environment: Biopolitics in the longue durée.Maurizio Meloni - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 88 (C):334-344.
Divide and conquer: The authority of nature and why we disagree about human nature.Maria Kronfeldner - 2018 - In Elizabeth Hannon & Tim Lewens (eds.), Why We Disagree About Human Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 186-206.
Speaking Wit to Power.Johannes Wietzke - 2022 - Classical Antiquity 41 (1):129-179.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references