Tommi Lehtonen
University of Vaasa
In this paper, I will introduce and argue for a new view on religious faith and language, a view that focuses on the use and context of use of religious expressions. I call this view implicaturism. As one may guess, ‘implicaturism’ comes from ‘implicature’, a term coined by Paul Grice. For Grice, implicature is a technical term for certain kinds of inferences that are drawn from statements without those inferences being logical implications or entailments. In the view of religious faith and language, implicaturism denotes the claims about the existence of God or other supernatural beings as pragmatic conclusions of the expressions used in religious practice, not the ground or presupposition of religious practice. In other words, in religious context, the claims of the form “X exists” (e.g. “God exists”) or “there are Xs” (e.g. “There are angeles”) are inferences that are based on prayers and worship expressions and their relatedbackground assumptions. This pattern of reasoning is not deductive, but abductive, thus inference from consequences to a possible cause. This kind of inference is logically invalid, in that the conclusion “God exists” is not a logical consequence of the premises: the religious expressions. The existential claims in religion (”God exists” or “There are angels” as examples) are thus some sort of a posteriori reasons or explanations for religious behaviour and related expressions, not their prior presuppositions
Keywords Conference Proceedings  Contemporary Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI wcp22200845265
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,163
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Toward a Pragmatic Conception of Religious Faith.Joshua L. Golding - 1990 - Faith and Philosophy 7 (4):486-503.
Credulism.Jonathan L. Kvanvig - 1984 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 16 (2):101 - 109.
How is God-Talk Logically Possible? A Sketch for an Argument on the Logic of 'God'.Heikki Kirjavainen - 2008 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 64 (2):75 - 88.
The Grounds of Worship.Tim Bayne & Yujin Nagasawa - 2006 - Religious Studies 42 (3):299-313.
A Critique of Religious Reductionism.Edward Henderson - 1982 - Philosophy Research Archives 8:429-456.
Faith, Hope and Doubt.Louis Pojman - forthcoming - Philosophy of Religion.
Logic as Instrument: The Millian View on the Role of Logic.Ken Akiba - 1996 - History and Philosophy of Logic 17 (1-2):73-83.
Can an Atheist Believe in God?Andrew S. Eshleman - 2005 - Religious Studies 41 (2):183 - 199.


Added to PP index

Total views
13 ( #769,201 of 2,506,517 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,791 of 2,506,517 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes