: Is Peirce's esthetic relevant for the philosophy of art—what is usually referred to today as aesthetics? At first glance Peirce's idiosyncratic esthetic seems quite unconcerned with issues of art. Yet a careful examination reveals that this is not the case. Thus, rather than attempt to "apply" Peirce's views to some aspect of the practice or the theory of art (e.g., creativity, historiography of art, style, genre), or even to a particular work of art, my intention is to examine how art fits into Peirce's own conception of his esthetic theory. The argument is divided into two parts. In the first section I present Peirce's conception of esthetics in the context of the normative sciences. I argue that esthetics connects with various strands of Peirce's philosophy, most notably his cosmology, his agapasm and with the way that important aspects of them hang together around the principle of abduction and the corresponding notion insight. In the second section, I consider in what way art may be said to be admirable, to contribute to the summum bonum. I try to show that Peirce's esthetic suggests that what attracts us towards art is first and foremost a semeiotic quality qua quality of mind or quality of Thirdness.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2979/TRA.2007.43.2.319
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,337
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

I Have To Confess I Cannot Read History So.Alessandro Topa - 2016 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 8 (2).
What Makes a Reasoning Sound? C. S. Peirce's Normative Foundation of Logic. Poggiani - 2012 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 48 (1):31.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Normative Sciences at Work and Play.Charles G. Conway - 2008 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (2):pp. 288-311.
Teleology and Semiosis: Commentary on T. L. Short's Peirce's Theory of Signs.James Liszka - 2007 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):636-644.
Peirce's Esthetics: A New Look.Beverley Kent - 1976 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 12 (3):263 - 283.
Peirce's Final Account of Signs and the Philosophy of Language.Albert Atkin - 2008 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (1):pp. 63-85.


Added to PP index

Total views
177 ( #66,368 of 2,507,888 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,715 of 2,507,888 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes