- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Anselm's perfect being theology
In The Cambridge Companion to Anselm. Cambridge University Press. pp. 132--156 (2004)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Why perfect being theology?Brian Leftow - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (2):103-118.
Reading Anselm's “Proslogion”: The History of Anselm's Argument and Its Significance Today – By Ian Logan.Lydia Schumacher - 2010 - Modern Theology 26 (3):471-473.
Anselm of Canterbury.Jasper Hopkins & Herbert Richardson - 1900 - New York: Edwin Mellen Press. Edited by Jasper Hopkins & Herbert Warren Richardson.
Anselm of canterbury and the beauty of theology. By David S. Hogg and Anselm of canterbury and his theological inheritance. By Giles E. M. Gasper. [REVIEW]Paschal Baumstein - 2007 - Heythrop Journal 48 (1):122–124.
Anselm, Gaunilo, and Lost Island.Keith Burgess-Jackson - 1994 - Philosophy and Theology 8 (3):243-249.
The Cambridge Companion to Anselm.Brian Leftow (ed.) - 2004 - New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-31
Downloads
3 (#1,682,188)
6 months
1 (#1,533,009)
2014-01-31
Downloads
3 (#1,682,188)
6 months
1 (#1,533,009)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Why perfect being theology?Brian Leftow - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (2):103-118.
Why the One Cannot Have Parts: Plotinus on Divine Simplicity, Ontological Independence, and Perfect Being Theology.Caleb M. Cohoe - 2017 - Philosophical Quarterly 67 (269):751-771.
Incompatible And Incomparable Perfections: A New Argument Against Perfect Being Theism.Jashiel Resto Quiñones - forthcoming - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion:1-19.
Formal reconstructions of St. Anselm’s ontological argument.Esther Ramharter & Günther Eder - 2015 - Synthese 192 (9):2795-2825.
Wherein lies the debate? Concerning whether God is a person.Ben Page - 2019 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 85 (3):297-317.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-hc2g5 uwo