What Berkeley’s Notions Are

Idealistic Studies 20 (1):19-41 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

All that we see, all that we touch, all that we perceive, are naught but ideas. There are trees and rivers, to be sure, but these are simply collections of ideas. Is everything, then, in this world an idea or made up of ideas? No. I, for one, am not an idea. Besides ideas there are spirits. I know that I, an active being, exist. It would seem that to know this and to know God exists, nay even for there to be any meaning in what I say when I use the words “I,” “God,” and “spirit,” I would have to have an idea of myself, an idea of God, and an idea of spirit. But this cannot be. Ideas are essentially passive and inert. Spriits are essentially active. How, then, could an idea represent or be an image of a spirit? And what sense is there to something being an idea if it does not represent its object? How, then, can my discourse about spirits have any meaning at all? I have a notion of spirit.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Berkeley's Theory of Notions.Desiree Park - 1963 - Dissertation, Indiana University
Berkeley's Theory of Relations.Denis Hsin-an Tsai - 1982 - Dissertation, Saint Louis University
The ramist context of Berkeley's philosophy.Stephen H. Daniel - 2001 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (3):487 – 505.
Berkeley and Irish philosophy.David Berman - 2005 - New York: Thoemmes Continuum.
Was Berkeley a Subjective Idealist?G. Callahan - 2015 - Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 21 (2):157-184.
George Berkeley: critical assessments.Walter E. Creery (ed.) - 1991 - New York: Routledge.
Berkeley and Gentile.Daniele Bertini - 2007 - Idealistic Studies 37 (1):43-50.
Berkeley's Theory of Notions.Daniel E. Flage - 1988 - Philosophical Quarterly 38 (150):134-137.
Berkeley, Pyrrhonism, and the Theaetetus.Kenneth Winkler - 2004 - In Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Pyrrhonian Skepticism. Oxford University Press. pp. 48--54.
Berkeley's notions.Daniel E. Flage - 1985 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (3):407-425.
Berkeley's theory of space.Robert Gray - 1978 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 16 (4):415-434.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
70 (#225,606)

6 months
14 (#154,299)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references