The cognitive science of religion: a modified theist response

&
Religious Studies 47 (3):301 - 316 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0034412510000302

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Aku Visala, Naturalism, Theism and the Cognitive Study of Religion: Religion Explained?, Ashgate, 2011.Helen De Cruz - 2013 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 5 (2):15--182.
Milvian Bridges in Science, Religion, and Theology: Debunking Arguments and Cultural Evolution.Lari Launonen & Aku Visala - 2022 - In Diego E. Machuca (ed.), Evolutionary Debunking Arguments: Ethics, Philosophy of Religion, Philosophy of Mathematics, Metaphysics, and Epistemology. New York: Routledge. pp. 185-204.
Pro-Science Rhetoric or a Research Program? – Naturalism in the Cognitive-Evolutionary Study of Religion.Aku Visala - 2018 - In Hans van Eyghen, Rik Peels & Gijsbert van den Brink (eds.), New Developments in the Cognitive Science of Religion - The Rationality of Religious Belief. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 51-69.
Agustín Fuentes and Aku Visala. eds. Verbs, Bones and Brains: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Human Nature. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2017. 293 pp. [REVIEW]Andrew Robinson - 2017 - Philosophy, Theology and the Sciences 4 (2):260.
Plato as Dipolar Theist.Leonard J. Eslick - 1982 - Process Studies 12 (4):243-251.
Cognitive Science of Religion, Atheism, and Theism.Myron A. Penner - 2018 - Faith and Philosophy 35 (1):105-131.
A New Theist Response to the New Atheists.Kevin Vallier & Joshua Rasmussen (eds.) - 2019 - New York: Routledge.
Scientific Knowledge Does Not Replace Religious Knowledge.Loren Haarsma - 2009 - In Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 151--167.
Cognitive Science of Religion and the Debunking Debate.Lari Launonen - 2017 - In Hanne Appelqvist & Dan-Johan Eklund (eds.), The Origins of Religion: Perspectives from Philosophy, Theology and Religious studies. Luther-Agricola Society. pp. 137-148.
Verbs, Bones, and Brains: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Human Nature.Agustin Fuentes & Aku Visala (eds.) - 2016 - Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-30

Downloads
124 (#173,977)

6 months
13 (#242,190)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Is supernatural belief unreliably formed?Hans Van Eyghen - 2018 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 85 (2):125-148.
Evolutionary debunking arguments against theism, reconsidered.Jonathan Jong & Aku Visala - 2014 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 76 (3):243-258.
Explaining Religion (Away?).Jonathan Jong - 2013 - Sophia 52 (3):521-533.
Naturalistic Explanation for Religious Belief.David Leech & Aku Visala - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (8):552-563.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references