Infinity and Newton’s Three Laws of Motion

Foundations of Physics 41 (12):1810-1828 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is shown that the following three common understandings of Newton’s laws of motion do not hold for systems of infinitely many components. First, Newton’s third law, or the law of action and reaction, is universally believed to imply that the total sum of internal forces in a system is always zero. Several examples are presented to show that this belief fails to hold for infinite systems. Second, two of these examples are of an infinitely divisible continuous body with finite mass and volume such that the sum of all the internal forces in the body is not zero and the body accelerates due to this non-null net internal force. So the two examples also demonstrate the breakdown of the common understanding that according to Newton’s laws a body under no external force does not accelerate. Finally, these examples also make it clear that the expression ‘impressed force’ in Newton’s formulations of his first and second laws should be understood not as ‘external force’ but as ‘exerted force’ which is the sum of all the internal and external forces acting on a given body, if the body is infinitely divisible

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Laws in Physics.Mathias Frisch - 2014 - European Review 22:S33-S49.
Newton's concepts of force and mass, with notes on the Laws of Motion.I. Bernard Cohen - 2002 - In I. Bernard Cohen & George E. Smith (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Newton. Cambridge University Press. pp. 57--84.
Newton's Classic Deductions from Phenomena.William Harper - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:183 - 196.
Cartwright, Forces, and Ceteris Paribus Laws.Barry Ward - 2009 - Southwest Philosophy Review 25 (1):55-62.
Beeckman, Descartes and the force of motion.Richard Arthur - 2007 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (1):1-28.
Rigid Body Motion in Special Relativity.Jerrold Franklin - 2013 - Foundations of Physics 43 (12):1489-1501.
Leibniz and Newton on Space.Ori Belkind - 2013 - Foundations of Science 18 (3):467-497.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
48 (#315,498)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Chunghyoung Lee
Pohang University of Science and Technology

Citations of this work

Unmoved movers: a very simple and novel form of indeterminism.Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia - 2022 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 12 (3):1-23.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Causation as folk science.John Norton - 2003 - Philosophers' Imprint 3:1-22.
Causation as folk science.John D. Norton - 2003 - In Huw Price & Richard Corry (eds.), Philosophers' Imprint. Oxford University Press.
A beautiful supertask.Jon Perez Laraudogoitia - 1996 - Mind 105 (417):81-83.
Losing energy in classical, relativistic and quantum mechanics.David Atkinson - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (1):170-180.

View all 14 references / Add more references