Philosophical Studies (forthcoming)

Authors
Wooram Lee
Universität Duisburg-Essen
Abstract
Recent years have seen the rise of fittingness-first views, which take fittingness to be the most basic normative feature, in terms of which other normative features can be explained. This paper poses a serious difficulty for the fittingness-first approach by showing that existing fittingness-first accounts cannot plausibly accommodate an important class of reasons: reasons not to believe a proposition. There are two kinds of reasons not to believe a proposition: considerations that are counterevidence; and considerations that count against believing the proposition without indicating that it is false. I will argue that the fittingness- first accounts have trouble accommodating reasons of the latter kind.
Keywords Reasons  Fittingness  Normativity  Withholding belief
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Knowledge and its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
On What Matters: Two-Volume Set.Derek Parfit - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Ethics Without Principles.Jonathan Dancy - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 2002 - Mind 111 (442):323-354.

View all 47 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reasons or Fittingness First?Richard Rowland - 2017 - Ethics 128 (1):212-229.
Getting Things Right: Fittingness, Value, and Reasons.Conor McHugh & Jonathan Way - forthcoming - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
The Fittingness of Emotions.Hichem Naar - 2021 - Synthese 199 (5-6):13601-13619.
The Fundamentality of Fit.Christopher Howard - 2019 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 14.
Fittingness First.Conor McHugh & Jonathan Way - 2016 - Ethics 126 (3):575-606.
The Fitting, the Deserving, and the Beautiful.Leo Zaibert - 2006 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (3):331-350.
Favoring.Antti Kauppinen - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (7):1953-1971.
Fittingness.Christopher Howard - 2018 - Philosophy Compass 13 (11):e12542.
Fittingness and Good Reasoning.John Brunero - 2019 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 16 (2).
Non-Consequentialism Demystified.Howard Nye, David Plunkett & John Ku - 2015 - Philosophers' Imprint 15 (4):1-28.
The Range of Reasons: In Ethics and Epistemology.Daniel Whiting - 2021 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Fittingness: The Sole Normative Primitive.Richard Yetter Chappell - 2012 - Philosophical Quarterly 62 (249):684 - 704.
Fitting Belief.Conor McHugh - 2014 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 114 (2pt2):167-187.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2022-05-06

Total views
118 ( #98,941 of 2,505,153 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
118 ( #5,945 of 2,505,153 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes