American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (3):469-488 (2007)
AbstractI reply to an article in the ACPA Proceedings of 2001 by John Crosby in which he challenged the position that evil as such is a privation. Each of his arguments attempts to present a counterexample to the privation position. His first argument, claiming that annihilation is evil but not a privation, fails to consider that a privation need not be contemporaneous with the subject suffering the privation. Contrary to his second argument, I explain that the repugnance of pain is consistent with its being good in the appropriate context. Against his third argument I contend that he mistakenly supposes that a choice’s being opposed to the good is incompatible with its being evil because of a disorder. I conclude by briefly reviewing one central argument for the privation position and contrast it with Crosby’s arguments, which, in addition to their other problems, fail to specify any intensional content, beyond repugnance in the case of pain, for the concept of evil.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Similar books and articles
Is All Evil Really Only Privation?John F. Crosby - 2001 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:197-209.
Doubts About the Privation Theory That Will Not Go Away: Response to Patrick Lee.John F. Crosby - 2007 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (3):489-505.
Privation Theories of Pain.Adam Swenson - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 66 (3):139 - 154.
The Depths of Defiance: Kierkegaard and the Problem of Evil.David Alan Roberts - 2000 - Dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale
Aristóteles En Torno a la Privación y la Casualidad.Amalia Quevedo - 1997 - Anuario Filosófico 30 (57):71-98.
Evil, Privation, Depression and Dread.Mark Ian Thomas Robson - 2013 - New Blackfriars 94 (1053):552-564.
Evil as Privation and Leibniz's Rejection of Empty Space.Stephen Puryear - 2016 - In Wenchao Li (ed.), Für Unser Glück oder das Glück Anderer: Vortrage des X. Internationalen Leibniz-Kongresses, vol. 3. Georg Olms. pp. 481-489.
The Privation Account of Moral Evil.W. Matthews Grant - 2015 - International Philosophical Quarterly 55 (3):271-286.
Is Evil a Relation? A Study in the Metaphysics of Value.Douglas Paul Davis - 1986 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo
Leibniz on Privations, Limitations, and the Metaphysics of Evil.Samuel Newlands - 2014 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 52 (2):281-308.
INTRODUCTION: The Evidential Argument From Evil.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 1996 - In The Evidential Argument from Evil.
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Meeting the Evil God Challenge.Ben Page & Max Baker-Hytch - 2020 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 101 (3):489-514.
Pursuing Pankalia: The Aesthetic Theodicy of St. Augustine.A. G. Holdier - 2016 - In Benjamin McCraw & Robert Arp (eds.), The Problem of Evil: New Philosophical Directions. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. pp. 69-83.
Die Phantasie Gottes: An Analysis of the Divine Ideas in Deity Theories and Brian Leftow, with A Proposed Synthesis.Nathaniel Dowell - unknown