Husserl Studies 23 (3):229-246 (2007)

Nam-In Lee
Seoul National University
It is the aim of this paper to assess Levinas’s criticism of Husserl’s concept of evidence. In Sect. 1, I will summarize Levinas’s criticism of Husserl’s concept of evidence. In Sect. 2, I will delineate Husserl’s concept of experience and in Sect. 3, I will try to define the concept of evidence in Husserl. In Sect. 4–6, I will assess Levinas’s criticism of Husserl’s concepts of evidence and show that Levinas’s criticism of Husserl’s concept of evidence is out of the mark, since it is based on a total misunderstanding of Husserl’s concepts of evidence.
Keywords Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10743-007-9024-0
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,355
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Experience and Judgment: Investigations in a Genealogy of Logic.Edmund Husserl - 1973 - Evanston, IL, USA: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Levels of the absolute in Husserl.Bence Peter Marosan - 2022 - Continental Philosophy Review 55 (2):137-158.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
81 ( #144,797 of 2,519,513 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,153 of 2,519,513 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes