Comparative Religious Ethics Among the Ruins

Journal of Religious Ethics 42 (3):571-584 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a response to the recent essay by Elizabeth M. Bucar and Aaron Stalnaker on “Comparative Religious Ethics as a Field of Study.” I clarify my earlier positions on method and virtue in comparative religious ethics and try to respond to some of the issues that Bucar and Stalnaker raise in regard to my arguments specifically and the field more generally. I argue that while we need not measure the practical impact of scholarly work in comparative religious ethics purely in terms of political or social action, I nevertheless worry that defining the goals of comparative inquiry in terms of the production of bewilderment, intellectual vertigo, or skeptical questions can lead to impressionistic or therapeutic methodological norms. In a similar vein, I refine my earlier position on externalism that acknowledges the impossibility of a purely externalist approach but also notes the desirability of coming to understand others “in their own terms” prior to engaging in the process of transmutation. I also question Bucar and Stalnaker's pessimism about the potential of producing “rigorously convincing ethical theory from the lived experience of regular folk,” suggesting that perhaps we are working with different conceptions of the sociology of knowledge. Finally, I consider whether we are currently in the midst of an epistemological crisis and conclude with some reflections on the rationality of the craft of comparative religious ethics

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Rhetoric Of Context.Jung H. Lee - 2013 - Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (4):555-584.
Response to Bucar and Stalnaker.John Kelsay - 2014 - Journal of Religious Ethics 42 (3):564-570.
Judging others: History, ethics, and the purposes of comparison.Aaron Stalnaker - 2008 - Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (3):425-444.
Teaching Comparative Religious Ethics: A Review Essay. [REVIEW]Kevin Schilbrack - 2002 - Journal of Religious Ethics 30 (2):295 - 312.
The Present State of the Comparative Study of Religious Ethics.David Little - 1981 - Journal of Religious Ethics 9 (2):210 - 227.
Max Weber and the Comparative Study of Religious Ethics.David Little - 1974 - Journal of Religious Ethics 2 (2):5 - 40.
On making a cultural turn in religious ethics.Richard B. Miller - 2005 - Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (3):409-443.
Comparative ethics, ideologies, and critical thought.Roderick Hindery - 2008 - Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (2):215-231.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-07-22

Downloads
10 (#1,026,208)

6 months
3 (#447,120)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jung Eun Lee
National University in San Diego

Citations of this work

Religious Ethics and Empirical Ethics.Ross Moret - 2021 - Journal of Religious Ethics 49 (1):33-67.
Exemplarist Environmental Ethics.Alda Balthrop-Lewis - 2019 - Journal of Religious Ethics 47 (3):525-550.
(The Image of) God in All of Us.Laura E. Alexander - 2019 - Journal of Religious Ethics 47 (4):653-678.

Add more citations