Absence Makes the Thought Grow Stronger: Reducing Structural Overlap Can Increase Inductive Strength

In B. C. Love, K. McRae & V. M. Sloutsky (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is structural similarity and is it greater in living things?Keith R. Laws - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):486-487.
On power set in explicit mathematics.Thomas Glass - 1996 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (2):468-489.
Breaking the law of desire.Joshua Gert - 2005 - Erkenntnis 62 (3):295-319.
Argentina and the Future.Jorge Schvarzer - 1985 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1985 (64):124-133.
The largest countable inductive set is a mouse set.Mitch Rudominer - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (2):443-459.
Arguments for the existence of God.R. G. Swinburne - 1984 - In J. Houston (ed.), Is it reasonable to believe in God? Edinburgh: Handsel Press. pp. 121 - 133.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-31

Downloads
26 (#595,031)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Models and Analogies in Science.Mary Hesse - 1965 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16 (62):161-163.
Features of similarity.Amos Tversky - 1977 - Psychological Review 84 (4):327-352.
Models and Analogies in Science.Mary B. Hesse - 1966 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 3 (3):190-191.

View all 8 references / Add more references