An Ethics of Propriety: Ritual, Roles, and Dependence in Early Confucianism

Asian Philosophy 23 (2):153-165 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This study examines the normative foundations of early Confucian ethics and suggests that rather than attempting to understand Confucian ethics in the language of ‘morality’ a more productive way would be to appreciate Confucianism as an ethics of propriety that can be articulated in terms of social roles, ritual decorum, and relational dependence. I argue that Western notions of ‘morality’ betray a thicker, more culturally loaded concept that possesses a limited utility in regard to comparative study. We can appeal to a kind of methodological charity where we not only maximize the sense of the text or subject's sayings but also privilege the categories of thought that are native to the text's or speaker's lexicon. With this in mind, we can understand Confucian ethics as an ethics of propriety that departs substantially from Western moral systems, including virtue ethics, and challenges our received views on justice, autonomy, and personal identity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,925

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
59 (#346,164)

6 months
7 (#633,631)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jung Lee
Northeastern University

Citations of this work

Confucian Role Ethics: A Critical Survey.John Ramsey - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (5):235-245.
Business Ethics, Confucianism and the Different Faces of Ritual.Chris Provis - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 165 (2):191-204.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Orientalism.Edward W. Said - 1978 - Vintage.
What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 2002 - Mind 111 (442):323-354.
The Theory and Practice of Autonomy.Gerald Dworkin - 1988 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 18 references / Add more references