Reid's Philosophy of Psychology

University Press of America (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Thomas Reid's philosophy of psychology is remarkably up to date. Surprisingly, Reid's account of instincts doesn't diverge greatly from Tinbergen's more contemporary account. Reid's claims with regard to appetites and desires can be made relevant to current insights

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reid and Modern Theories of Emotions.Marion Ledwig - 2009 - In Sabine Roeser (ed.), Reid on Ethics. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Reid and Wittgenstein on philosophy and language.Henning Jensen - 1979 - Philosophical Studies 36 (4):359 - 376.
Thomas Reid and non-euclidean geometry.Amit Hagar - 2002 - Reid Studies 5 (2):54-64.
The function of sensations in Reid.Todd Buras - 2009 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (3):pp. 329-353.
In Defense of Thomas Reid's Use of 'Suggestion'.Ronald E. Beanblossom - 1975 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 1 (1):19-24.
Reid and Priestley on method and the mind.Alan Tapper - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):511-525.
Thomas Reid's inquiry and essays.Thomas Reid - 1863 - Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill. Edited by Keith Lehrer & Ronald E. Beanblossom.
Was Reid a Direct Realist?Jake Quilty-Dunn - 2013 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (2):302 - 323.
Reid and Priestley on Method and the Mind.Alan Tapper - 2003 - In John Haldane Stephen Read (ed.), The Philosophy of Thomas Reid. pp. 98-112.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-06

Downloads
1 (#1,886,728)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references