Justice, Injustice and the Work of Julia Kristeva

Theory, Culture and Society 40 (6):51-68 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Taking a largely thematic approach, this reflection aims to demonstrate the richness of Julia Kristeva’s theoretical work in relation to questions of justice and injustice. Injustice becomes primary because a definition of justice continues to be open to debate, whereas injustice as incarnate in the scapegoat as depicted by René Girard is far less so, if at all. Through her analyses of the work of Mallarmé and the Paris of the Dreyfus affair, Céline and abjection and anti-Semitism, the ‘need to believe’ as a key component of subjectivity, the foreigner as the other in ourselves, Dostoyevsky and forgiveness, a vista is opened up onto injustice and how it might be combatted.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The concept of injustice.Eric Heinze - 2013 - New York,: Routledge.
Judging Students and Racial Injustice.Eric Bayruns Garcia - 2021 - APA Newsletter on Hispanic/Latino Issues in Philosophy 1 (21):15-20.
AI and Structural Injustice: Foundations for Equity, Values, and Responsibility.Johannes Himmelreich & Désirée Lim - 2023 - In Justin B. Bullock, Yu-Che Chen, Johannes Himmelreich, Valerie M. Hudson, Anton Korinek, Matthew M. Young & Baobao Zhang (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of AI Governance. Oxford University Press.
Everyday justice: law, ethnography, injustice.Sandra Brunnegger (ed.) - 2019 - New York: Cambridge University Press.


Added to PP

3 (#1,729,579)

6 months
1 (#1,516,603)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations