Why Moral Bioenhancement Cannot Reliably Produce Virtue

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 49 (6):560-575 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Moral bioenhancement presents the possibility of enhancing morally desirable emotions and dispositions. While some scholars have proposed that moral bioenhancement can produce virtue, we argue that within a virtue ethics framework moral bioenhancement cannot reliably produce virtue. Moreover, on a virtue ethics framework, the pursuit of moral bioenhancement carries moral risks. To make this argument, we consider three aspects of virtue—its motivational, rational, and behavioral components. In order to be virtuous, we argue, a person must (i) take pleasure in doing the right thing and have the correct motivational attitudes; (ii) reason correctly about what is called for in a particular ethical dilemma; and (iii) intentionally and continuously practice and cultivate virtues. These dimensions of morality—in short: precisely those emphasized in a virtue ethics framework—cannot be consistently or reliably met using existing moral bioenhancement technology.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,010

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-11-24

Downloads
19 (#1,175,554)

6 months
19 (#161,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Gina Lebkuecher
Wuhan University
Joseph Vukov
Loyola University, Chicago

Citations of this work

Seeing the Good in Medical Ethics.Finn Wilson - 2024 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 49 (6):513-521.

Add more citations