The Implications of Genetic and Other Biological Explanations for Thinking about Mental Disorders

Hastings Center Report 49 (S1):82-87 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Given the rise of genetic etiological beliefs regarding psychiatric disorders, a growing body of research has focused on trying to elucidate the effects that such explanatory frameworks might be having on how mental disorders are perceived by patients, clinicians, and the general public. Genetic and other biomedical explanations of mental disorders have long been seen as a potential tool in the efforts to destigmatize mental disorders, given the harshness of the widespread negative attitudes about them and the important negative clinical and social impacts of this stigma. The conventional wisdom has appeared to be that because the effects of genes are seen as falling outside individual control, conceiving of mental disorders as caused by genes casts patients as blameless, thereby reducing stigmatization. Indeed, the results of experimental and correlational research have now robustly linked genetic and other biomedical explanations for mental disorders with reductions in the extent to which people are blamed for their psychiatric symptoms. However, research examining the impact of genetic and other biomedical explanations of mental disorders has also suggested that they can have significant downsides. The most consistently observed negative effect of these kinds of explanations is that they can apparently lead to the assumption that mental disorders are unlikely to improve or abate. Genetic and other biomedical explanations of mental disorders can also increase people’s confidence in the effectiveness of biomedical treatments (such as pharmacotherapy) but decrease their confidence in the effectiveness of “nonbiomedical” treatments (such as psychotherapy).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mental Disorder as a Practical Psychiatric Kind.Brian O'Connor - 2017 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 24 (4):1-13.
Biological explanations and social responsibility.Inmaculada de Melo-Martín - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34 (2):345-358.
Why We Essentialize Mental Disorders.Pieter R. Adriaens & Andreas De Block - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (2):107-127.
An evaluation of the DSM concept of mental disorder.Guy A. Boysen - 2007 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 28 (2):157-173.
Genetic discrimination and mental illness: a case report.J. G. Wong - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (6):393-397.
Mental disorders are not a homogeneous construct.Polimeni Joseph - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):419.
The Reality and Classification of Mental Disorders.Jonathan Y. Tsou - 2008 - Dissertation, University of Chicago
The need for new ontologies in psychiatry.Robyn Bluhm - 2017 - Philosophical Explorations 20 (2):146-159.
Homology thinking.Marc Ereshefsky - 2012 - Biology and Philosophy 27 (3):381-400.
The molecular turn in psychiatry: A philosophical analysis.Abraham Rudnick - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (3):287 – 296.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-04

Downloads
18 (#711,533)

6 months
4 (#319,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Chapter 3 Research Methods.Nguyen Tan Dat - 2020 - In The Situation of Mental Health Problems among Secondary School Students in Can Tho City. pp. 23-58.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references