Genetic Fundamentalism or the Cult of the Gene

Body and Society 10 (4):1-20 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The notion of information puts the human, the animal and the vegetable all on the same plane, and tends to dissolve the previous specificities of these categories. DNA, in this way, is fetishized. Also, the notion of information, and of the gene, has moved from the domain of expert or technical culture to become a part of mass culture: a development that has important social consequences. The human body is seen as a prototype that needs to be tested or rectified (a consequence of the notion of ‘bad’ genes). From prenatal testing to the courtroom, it is implicitly around the notion a ‘life worth living’ (that is to say, of good morphological or genetic quality) that intense debates have arisen concerning the status of the body, of illness and of disability. Genetics is becoming part of the social environment, and it is setting itself up as a form of secular religion, with fundamentalist overtones. This article will analyse the anthropological shifts that have grown up around these new definitions of the human.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Genetics and bioethics: How our thinking has changed since 1969.LeRoy Walters - 2012 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (1):83-95.
Genetic Justice Must Track Genetic Complexity.Colin Farrelly - 2008 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (1):45-53.
Historical development of the concept of the Gene.Petter Portin - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (3):257 – 286.
The Moral Significance of the Therapy-Enhancement Distinction in Human Genetics.David B. Resnik - 2000 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (3):365-377.
Gene replacement therapy in the CNS: A view from the retina.Gail M. Seigel - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):69-69.
Genetic Disorders and the Ethical Status of Germ-Line Gene Therapy.E. M. Berger & B. M. Gert - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (6):667-683.
Gene Doping and the Responsibility of Bioethicists.Ashkan Atry, Mats G. Hansson & Ulrik Kihlbom - 2011 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 5 (2):149 - 160.
Gene Patents Can Be Ethical.Glenn Mcgee - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):417-421.
Analytical perspectives on religious fundamentalism.Jakobus Martinus Vorster - 2007 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 6 (17):5-20.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-19

Downloads
15 (#923,100)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Abortion and infanticide.Michael Tooley - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 2 (1):37-65.
Should the Baby Live?Helga Kuhse & Peter Singer - 1985 - Oxford University Press USA.
Abortion and Infanticide.Michael Tooley - 1972 - Philosophy 59 (230):545-547.
Simulacres et simulation.Jean Baudrillard - 1981 - Editions Galilée.

Add more references