Simplicity and elegance in Millikan’s account of productivity: reply to Martinez

Philosophical Psychology 29 (4):503-516 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper responds to a problem, raised by Martinez, for Millikan’s explanation of the interpretability of novel signs in terms of mapping functions. I argue that Martinez’s critique is a logically weakened version of Kripke’s skeptical argument about rule following. Responding to Martinez requires two things. First, we must correctly understand the role of simplicity and elegance in choosing the correct mapping function for a signaling system. Second, we need to understand that mapping functions are descriptions of the features that determine the content of signs; they do not themselves determine the content of signs. Bearing these facts in mind, Martinez’s concern is assuaged. However, we find that this position on the role of mapping functions is not fully consistent with Millikan’s response to Kripke. I modify her response to Kripke and demonstrate that the alterations do not undermine her view.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,480

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Teleosemantics and Productivity.Manolo Martinez - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology 26 (1):47-68.
Millikan’s Isomorphism Requirement.Nicholas Shea - 2013 - In Dan Ryder, Justine Kingsbury & Kenneth Williford (eds.), Millikan and Her Critics. Wiley-Blackwell.
Millikan über natürliche und intentionale Zeichen.Wolfgang Detel - 2010 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 58 (6):893-912.
Are There Wordlike Concepts Too?Christopher Gauker - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):70-71.
Simplicity in the Best Systems Account of Laws of Nature.James Woodward - 2014 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65 (1):91-123.
Elegance in Science: The Beauty of Simplicity.Ian Glynn - 2010 - Oxford University Press UK.
Millikan’s Theory of Signs. [REVIEW]François Recanati - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (3):674–681.
Conventions Made Too Simple?Martin Bunzl & Richard Kreuter - 2003 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (4):417-426.
Teleosemantics and Useless Content: A Critical Remark on Millikan’s Account.Andrés L. Jaume - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 42:85-90.
A Proper Understanding of Millikan.Justine Kingsbury - 2006 - Acta Analytica 21 (40):23-40.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-16

Downloads
36 (#321,828)

6 months
2 (#277,475)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?