Moral Objectivity

Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series 17:135-170 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Morality exercises a deep and questionable influence on the way we live our lives. The influence is deep both because moral injunctions are embedded in our psyches long before we can reflect on their status and because even after we become reflective agents, the question of how we should live our lives among others is intimately bound up with the more general question of how we should live our lives: our stance toward morality and our conception of our lives as having significance are of a piece. The influence is questionable because morality pretends to a level of objectivity that it may not possess. Moral injunctions are meant to be binding on us in some way that is independent of the desires or preferences we may happen to have. When one asserts that a certain action is morally worthy or shameful one is, prime facie, doing more than merely expressing approval or disapproval or trying to get others to act as instruments of one's own will. If moral assertions were shown, at bottom, to be merely such exhortations, then they would be shown to wear a disguise. Morality would be revealed as pretending to an objectivity it does not have, and such a revelation could not but have a profound impact on our lives. It is doubtful that such a revelation could be kept locked up inside our studies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Formulating Moral Objectivity.Elizabeth Tropman - 2018 - Philosophia 46 (4):1023-1040.
Two Problems of Moral Objectivity.Steven Ross - 2001 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):49-62.
Moral Objectivity: A Kantian Illusion?Carla Bagnoli - 2015 - Journal of Value Inquiry 49 (1-2):31-45.
Moral Objectivity.Jonathan Lear - 1984 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series 17:135-170.
Objectivity: a very short introduction.Stephen Gaukroger - 2012 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Moral Relativism and Moral Objectivity.Judith Thomson - 1996 - Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by Judith Jarvis Thomson.
Truth and Moral Objectivity: Procedural Realism in Putnam's Pragmatism.Francisco Gil Martín & Jesús Encabo - 2008 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 95:265-285.
II—Objectivity and Idolatry.Yonatan Shemmer - 2016 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 90 (1):191-216.
After objectivity: An empirical study of moral judgment.Shaun Nichols - 2004 - Philosophical Psychology 17 (1):3 – 26.
Objectivity in Law and Morals.Brian Leiter (ed.) - 2000 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Intractable conflicts and moral objectivity: A dialogical, problem-based approach.William Rehg - 1999 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 42 (2):229 – 257.
Moral objectivity.Nicholas Rescher - 2008 - Social Philosophy and Policy 25 (1):393-409.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-02

Downloads
63 (#231,470)

6 months
9 (#144,939)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jonathan Lear
University of Chicago

Citations of this work

False consciousness.Denise Meyerson - 1991 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophical investigations.Ludwig Wittgenstein & G. E. M. Anscombe - 1953 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 161:124-124.
Critique of Pure Reason.I. Kant - 1787/1998 - Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.
Kantian constructivism in moral theory.John Rawls - 1980 - Journal of Philosophy 77 (9):515-572.

View all 24 references / Add more references