Journal of Moral Philosophy 16 (1):1-26 (2019)

Authors
Seth Lazar
Australian National University
Abstract
I argue that riskier killings of innocent people are, other things equal, objectively worse than less risky killings. I ground these views in considerations of disrespect and security. Killing someone more riskily shows greater disrespect for him by more grievously undervaluing his standing and interests, and more seriously undermines his security by exposing a disposition to harm him across all counterfactual scenarios in which the probability of killing an innocent person is that high or less. I argue that the salient probabilities are the agent’s sincere, sane, subjective probabilities, and that this thesis is relevant whether your risk-taking pertains to the probability of killing a person or to the probability that the person you kill is not liable to be killed. I then defend the view’s relevance to intentional killing; show how it differs from an account of blameworthiness; and explain its significance for all-things-considered justification and justification under uncertainty.
Keywords pro tanto wrongfulness   rights   risk  harm
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2019
DOI 10.1163/17455243-46810076
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

In Dubious Battle: Uncertainty and the Ethics of Killing.Seth Lazar - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (4):859-883.
The Problem with Negligence.Matt King - 2009 - Social Theory and Practice 35 (4):577-595.
The Metaphysics of Chance.Rachael Briggs - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (11):938-952.
Risk, Rights, and Restitution.M. J. Zimmerman - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 128 (2):285-311.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

In Dubious Battle: Uncertainty and the Ethics of Killing.Seth Lazar - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (4):859-883.
Can a Risk of Harm Itself Be a Harm?Thomas Rowe - 2022 - Analysis 81 (4):694-701.
Self-Defense.Helen Frowe & Jonathan Parry - 2021 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2021.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Risky Killing and the Ethics of War.Seth Lazar - 2015 - Ethics 126 (1):91-117.
The Basis of Moral Liability to Defensive Killing.Jeff McMahan - 2005 - Philosophical Issues 15 (1):386–405.
A Reappraisal of the Doctrine of Doing and Allowing.David K. Chan - 2010 - In Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O'Rourke & Harry S. Silverstein (eds.), Action, Ethics, and Responsibility. MIT Press. pp. 25-45.
Killing and Dying.Dan Moller - 2006 - American Philosophical Quarterly 43 (3):235-247.
A Concise Argument: On the Wrongness of Killing.Thomas Douglas - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (1):1-2.
Life-Prolonging Killings and Their Relevance to Ethics.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 1999 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (2):135-147.
Associative Duties and the Ethics of Killing in War.Seth Lazar - 2013 - Journal of Practical Ethics 1 (1):3-48.
When the Risk of Harm Harms.Adriana Placani - 2017 - Law and Philosophy 36 (1):77-100.
Rights, Explanation, and Risks.David McCarthy - 1997 - Ethics 107 (2):205-225.
Equating Innocent Threats and Bystanders.Helen Frowe - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (4):277-290.
Defensive Killing.Helen Frowe - 2014 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-03-02

Total views
425 ( #22,787 of 2,505,156 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #31,106 of 2,505,156 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes