Philosophical Quarterly 68 (271):265-285 (2018)

Hugh Lazenby
University of Glasgow
This article offers an account of the information condition on morally valid consent in the context of sexual relations. The account is grounded in rights. It holds that a person has a sufficient amount of information to give morally valid consent if, and only if, she has all the information to which she has a claim-right. A person has a claim-right to a piece of information if, and only if, a. it concerns a deal-breaker for her; b. it does not concern something that her partner has a strong interest in protecting from scrutiny, sufficient to generate a privilege-right; c.i. her partner is aware of the information to which her deal-breaker applies; or c.ii. her partner ought to be held responsible for the fact that he is not aware of the information to which her deal-breaker applies; and finally, d. she has not waived or forfeited her claim-right. Although we present this account in the context of sexual relations, we believe a virtue of the account is that it can be easily translated into other contexts.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/pq/pqx044
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,979
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Harm to Self.Joel Feinberg - 1986 - Oxford University Press, USA.
Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics.Neil C. Manson - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.
Sex, Lies, and Consent.Tom Dougherty - 2013 - Ethics 123 (4):717-744.
Autonomy and Personal History.John Christman - 1991 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21 (1):1 - 24.
Why Privacy is Important.James Rachels - 1975 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 (4):323-333.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Deception and Consent.Tom Dougherty - 2018 - In Peter Schaber & Andreas Müller (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Ethics of Consent. Routledge.
Elusive Consent.Alexandra Lloyd - 2021 - Public Affairs Quarterly 34.
Coerced Consent with an Unknown Future.Tom Dougherty - 2021 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 103 (2):441-461.
Sex, Love, and Paternalism.David Birks - 2021 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24 (1):257-270.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Consent to Sexual Relations.Alan Wertheimer - 2003 - Cambridge University Press.
Consent to Sexual Relations.Alan Wertheimer - 2006 - Law and Philosophy 25 (2):267-287.
The Morality of Blackmail.James R. Shaw - 2012 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 40 (3):165-196.
Is Sex With Robots Rape?Romy Eskens - 2017 - Journal of Practical Ethics 5 (2):62-76.
The Kantian Moral Worth of Actions Contrary to Duty.Samuel J. Kerstein - 1999 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 53 (4):530 - 552.
Some Information is Too Dangerous to Be on the Internet.Vincent C. Müller - 2006 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 36 (1):2.
Informed Consent and the Requirement to Ensure Understanding.Tom Walker - 2012 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (1):50-62.
Disagreeing with Confidence.Brian Besong - 2017 - Theoria 83 (4):419-439.
Towards a Sexual Ethics for Adolescence.Jan Steutel - 2009 - Journal of Moral Education 38 (2):185-198.
Friendship and the Self.Dean Cocking & Jeanette Kennett - 1998 - Ethics 108 (3):502-527.


Added to PP index

Total views
63 ( #181,154 of 2,504,849 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #170,306 of 2,504,849 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes