Noûs 53 (1):97-113 (2019)

Authors
Seth Lazar
Australian National University
Chad Lee-Stronach
Stanford University
Abstract
Consider the following claim: given the choice between saving a life and preventing any number of people from temporarily experiencing a mild headache, you should always save the life. Many moral theorists accept this claim. In doing so, they commit themselves to some form of ‘moral absolutism’: the view that there are some moral considerations that cannot be outweighed by any number of lesser moral considerations. In contexts of certainty, it is clear what moral absolutism requires of you. However, what does it require of you when deciding under risk? What ought you to do when there is a chance that, say, you will not succeed in saving the life? In recent years, various critics have argued that moral absolutism cannot satisfactorily deal with risk and should, therefore, be abandoned. In this paper, we show that moral absolutism can answer its critics by drawing on—of all things—orthodox expected utility theory.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2017, 2019
DOI 10.1111/nous.12210
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,784
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 2002 - Mind 111 (442):323-354.
Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - Philosophy 52 (199):102-105.
The Morality of Freedom.Joseph Raz - 1986 - Philosophy 63 (243):119-122.

View all 57 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

In Dubious Battle: Uncertainty and the Ethics of Killing.Seth Lazar - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (4):859-883.
Partial Aggregation in Ethics.Joe Horton - 2021 - Philosophy Compass 16 (3):1-12.
Moral Priorities Under Risk.Chad Lee-Stronach - 2018 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 48 (6):793-811.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Moral Relativism and Moral Expressivism.Berit Brogaard - 2012 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (4):538-556.
Absolutism and its Consequentialist Critics.Joram Graf Haber - 1994 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
A Critique of Harman’s Empiric Relativism.Byron L. Haines - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Research 18:97-107.
Professor Waldron Goes to Washington.Susan Mendus - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (1):123-134.
A Critique of Harman’s Empiric Relativism.Byron L. Haines - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Research 18:97-107.
The Real Direction of Dancy’s Moral Particularism.Edmund Wall - 2011 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (4):587-612.
A Prima Facie Defense of Hobbesian Absolutism.Shane D. Courtland - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (4):419-449.
Moralism.Julia Driver - 2005 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (2):137-151.
Moralism.Julia Driver - 2005 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (2):137–151.
A Thing or Two About Absolutism and Its Historiography.Cesare Cuttica - 2013 - History of European Ideas 39 (2):287-300.
Relativism, Absolutism, and Tolerance.Hye-Kyung Kim & Michael Wreen - 2003 - Metaphilosophy 34 (4):447-459.
Absolutism and Individuality in Hobbes.Predrag Milidrag - 2006 - Filozofija I Društvo 2006 (31):57-78.
Moral Absolutism and Ectopic Pregnancy.Christopher Kaczor - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (1):61 – 74.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-07-28

Total views
120 ( #92,326 of 2,463,146 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #41,759 of 2,463,146 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes