Research in Phenomenology 35 (1):11-28 (2005)

Authors
Leonard Lawlor
Pennsylvania State University
Abstract
In this essay, I start from Foucault's last text, his "Life: Experience and Science." Speaking of Canguilhem, Foucault makes a distinction between "le vécu" (lived-experience) and "le vivant" (the living). I then examine this difference between "le vécu" (lived-experience) and "le vivant" (the living); that is, I examine the different logics, we might say, of immanence that each concept implies. To do this, I reconstruct the "critique" that Foucault presents of the concept of vécu in the ninth chapter of The Order of Things (Les Mots et les choses): "Man and His Doubles." I try to show how this critique applies to the early Merleau-Ponty, the Merleau-Ponty of the Phenomenology of Perception. Then, I construct the positive logic of Foucault's relation of immanence by means of another text, which is contemporaneous with Les Mots et les choses: This is not a Pipe. The critique of the concept of vécu is based on the fact that the relationship in vécu is a mixture (un mélange) that closes "un écart infime." Conversely, Foucault's conception of the relationship in "le vivant" is one that dissociates and keeps "l'écart infime" open. At the end, I suggest, through three "landmarks," how Foucault's critique might be applied to the later Merleau-Ponty. This essay is Part I of a trilogy on Merleau-Ponty and Foucault. Part II concerns Merleau-Ponty's "mixturism," while Part III concerns "the blind spot" in Foucault. These three texts complete the work necessary to open the problem of memory and life.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/1569164054905500
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,214
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

.Paul Blackledge & Kelvin Knight (eds.) - 2011 - University of Notre Dame Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Merleau-Ponty's Concept of Depth.Anthony J. Steinbock - 1987 - Philosophy Today 31 (4):336-351.
On the “Perfect Time of Human Experience”: Agamben and Foucault.Benjamin S. Pryor - 2011 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (1):65-78.
On Questioning Being: Foucault’s Heideggerian Turn.Timothy Rayner - 2004 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (4):419 – 438.
Deleuze and Merleau-Ponty: Immanence, Univocity and Phenomenology.Jack Reynolds & Jon Roffe - 2006 - Journal of the British Society of Phenomenology 37 (3):228-51.
Un Ecart Infime (Part III): The Blind Spot in Foucault.Leonard Lawlor - 2005 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 31 (5-6):665-685.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
52 ( #218,193 of 2,507,561 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,983 of 2,507,561 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes