Red herrings, circuit-breakers and ageism in the COVID-19 debate

Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (9):645-646 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In their recent paper ‘Why lockdown of the elderly is not ageist and why levelling down equality is wrong’ Savulescu and Cameron attempt to argue the case for subjecting the ‘elderly’ to limits not imposed on other generations. We argue that selective lockdown of the elderly is unnecessary and cruel, as well as discriminatory, and that this group may suffer more than others in similar circumstances. Further, it constitutes an unjustifiable deprivation of liberty.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 79,857

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Lockdown, public good and equality during COVID-19.Lucy Frith - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (11):713-714.
COVID-19: Against a Lockdown Approach.Steven R. Kraaijeveld - 2020 - Asian Bioethics Review 13 (2):195-212.
Ageism and equality.John Harris & Sadie Regmi - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (5):263-266.
Ageism in science: Fair-play between generations.Johannes J. F. Schroots - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (4):445-451.
Circuit Breakers and the Mission of Stock Market Stability.J. Scott Colesanti - 2009 - Nexus - Chapman's Journal of Law & Policy 15:43.


Added to PP

8 (#1,010,523)

6 months
1 (#479,713)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?