Organ sales needn't be exploitative (but it matters if they are)

Bioethics 25 (5):250-259 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper considers two arguments that are common in the literature on organ sales. First, organ sales are exploitative and therefore should not be permitted. Second, it doesn't matter whether organ sales are exploitative or not; the only thing that matters is that we do what is in the interests of those who need to be protected.In this paper, I argue that both of these arguments are too simplistic. My intention, however, is not to argue for or against organ sales. My conclusion, rather, is simply that we cannot hope to address the issue of organ sales if we lack a good understanding of exploitation. We should not attempt to answer the question of whether or not organ sales should be banned on the grounds that they are exploitative without acknowledging and addressing the nuances involved in understanding exploitation



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,102

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The sales process and the paradoxes of trust.G. Oakes - 1990 - Journal of Business Ethics 9 (8):671 - 679.
Autonomy and Organ Sales, Revisited.J. S. Taylor - 2009 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (6):632-648.
Markets and the needy: Organ sales or aid?T. L. Zutlevics - 2001 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (3):297–302.
Organ Sales and Moral Distress.Eduardo Rivera-lópez - 2006 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (1):41-52.
Ambivalence, Autonomy, and Organ Sales.Paul M. Hughes - 2006 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (2):237-251.


Added to PP

112 (#150,478)

6 months
4 (#477,225)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rob Lawlor
University of Leeds

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references