Is There Collective Responsibility For Misogyny Perpetrated On Social Media?

In Carissa Véliz (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Digital Ethics. Oxford University Press (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Women, particularly those in public positions (e.g. journalists, politicians, celebrities, activists) are subject to disproportionate amounts of abuse on social media platforms like Twitter. This abuse occurs in a landscape that those platforms designed, and maintain. Focusing in particular on Twitter, as typical of the kind of platform we’re interested in, we argue that it is the platform not (usually) the individuals who use it, that bears collective responsibility as a corporate agent for misogyny. Social media platforms, however, should not overstep the prevention of misogyny into interference in open political debates.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Masculine Foes, Feminist Woes: A Response to Down Girl.Briana Toole - 2019 - APA Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy.
Christianity, Misogyny and Women.Nzeyo Gabriel Eteng - 2019 - Lwati: A Journal of Contemporary Research 16 (3):115-130.
Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny by Kate Manne. [REVIEW]Audrey Yap - 2019 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 29 (1):10-17.
The Power of #Hashtags.Jens Mueller - 2020 - Journal of Catholic Social Thought 17 (2):195-218.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-09

Downloads
52 (#293,581)

6 months
15 (#145,565)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Holly Lawford-Smith
University of Melbourne

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references