A positive relationship between reinforcement and resistance to extinction produced by removing a source of confusion from a technique that had produced opposite results

&
Journal of Experimental Psychology 37 (6):494 (1947)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0060341

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Resistance to extinction when continuous reinforcement is followed by partial reinforcement.David Hothersall - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (1):109.
Influence of a small number of partial reinforcement training trials on resistance to extinction.E. J. Capaldi & Dick Hart - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (2):166.
Extinction as a function of the spacing of extinction trials.Walter C. Stanley - 1952 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 43 (4):249.
Resistance to extinction as a function of the amount of reinforcement present during acquisition.Bradley Reynolds - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (1):46.
Resistance to extinction as a function of percentage of reinforcement, number of training trials, and conditioned reinforcement.Norman Kass & Helen Wilson - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (3):355.
Effects of intertrial reinforcement on resistance to extinction following extended training.Roger W. Black & Kenneth W. Spence - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 70 (6):559.
Resistance to extinction as a function of the fixed ratio.John J. Boren - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (4):304.
Effect of intertrial reinforcement on the aftereffect of nonreinforcement and resistance to extinction.E. J. Capaldi, Dick Hart & Larry R. Stanley - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (1):70.
Resistance to extinction when partial reinforcement is followed by regular reinforcement.Herbert M. Jenkins - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (5):441.
Resistance to extinction at spaced trials using the within-subject procedure.Roger L. Mellgren & Jeffrey A. Seybert - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 100 (1):151.
Resistance to extinction as a joint function of reward magnitude and the spacing of extinction trials.Winfred F. Hill & Norman E. Spear - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (6):636.
Resistance to extinction and the pattern of reinforcement: III. The effect of trial patterning in verbal "conditioning.".Harold W. Hake, David A. Grant & John P. Hornseth - 1951 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 41 (3):221.
Successive nonreinforcements (N-length) and resistance to extinction at spaced trials.Jared B. Jobe & Roger L. Mellgren - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (4):652.
The effect of intermittent reinforcement on the change in extinction rate following successive reconditionings.Charles C. Perkins Jr & Anthony J. Cacioppo - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (6):794.
Resistance to extinction as a function of partial reinforcement and bar weighting: A within-S design.A. Grant Young - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (2p1):363.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
17 (#849,202)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references