Why we do not have to treat like cases alike

Journal of Value Inquiry 22 (4):313-318 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Offers reasons for rejecting principle of relevant similarity. Like cases need not be treated alike. I may treat one person better than another simply because I prefer to do so.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Treating like cases alike : principle and classification in private law.Charlie Webb - 2009 - In Andrew Robertson & Hang Wu Tang (eds.), The goals of private law. Portland, Or.: Hart.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
30 (#517,657)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Lavin
Stanford University (PhD)

Citations of this work

The roots of relevant similarity.Margaret Ayotte Levvis - 1992 - Journal of Value Inquiry 26 (2):289-291.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references