Who Should Be Committable?

Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 2 (1):35-47 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Defends an alternative to danger to self or others as a basis for involuntary treatment. Involuntary hospitalization for treatment should hinge on a patient's competence to refuse treatment

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Commentary on" Who Should be Committable?".Margaret Brazier - 1995 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 2 (1):49-50.
Why we do not have to treat like cases alike.Michael Lavin - 1988 - Journal of Value Inquiry 22 (4):313-318.
Separating Death from Mind and Morals.Michael Lavin - 1989 - Public Affairs Quarterly 3 (3):35-47.
How not to define death: Some objections to cognitive approaches.Michael Lavin - 1985 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):313-324.
Karen Grandstrand Gervais, Redefining Death Reviewed by.Michael Lavin - 1987 - Philosophy in Review 7 (12):492-494.
Sports and Drugs: Are the Current Bans Justified?Michael Lavin - 1987 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 14 (1):34-43.
Ideal agency and the possibility of error.Bradford Cokelet - 2008 - Ethics 118 (2):315-323.
The art of art history.Irving Lavin - 1994 - World Futures 40 (1):13-25.
Must There Be Basic Action?Douglas Lavin - 2012 - Noûs 47 (2):273-301.
Practical reason and the possibility of error.Douglas Lavin - 2004 - Ethics 114 (3):424-457.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
29 (#538,668)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Lavin
Stanford University (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references