If Criminal Intentions Are Nonvoluntary, Mandatory Neurointerventions Might Be Permissible

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):154-156 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/21507740.2018.1496178

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Mandatory Neurointerventions Could Enhance the Mental Integrity of Certain Criminal Offenders.Andrea C. Palk - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):150-152.
Self-Control in Responsibility Enhancement and Criminal Rehabilitation.Polaris Koi, Susanne Uusitalo & Jarno Tuominen - 2018 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 12 (2):227-244.
The Costs to Criminal Theory of Supposing that Intentions are Irrelevant to Permissibility.Douglas Husak - 2009 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (1):51-70.
‘Drugs That Make You Feel Bad’? Remorse-Based Mitigation and Neurointerventions.Jonathan Pugh & Hannah Maslen - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (3):499-522.
Neural and Environmental Modulation of Motivation: What's the Moral Difference?Thomas Douglas - forthcoming - In David Birks & Thomas Douglas (eds.), Treatment for Crime: Philosophical Essays on Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coercion and the Neurocorrective Offer.Jonathan Pugh - forthcoming - In David Rhys Birks & Thomas Douglas (eds.), reatment for Crime: Philosophical Essays on Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice. Oxford, UK:
Mandatory Neurointerventions and the Risk of Racial Disparity.Timothy Emmanuel Brown - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):156-157.
Neuro-interventions as Criminal Rehabilitation: An Ethical Review.Jonathan Pugh & Thomas Douglas - 2016 - In Jonathan Jacobs & Jonathan Jackson (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Criminal Justice Ethics. Routledge.
Punishing Intentions and Neurointerventions.David Birks & Alena Buyx - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):133-143.
Neurointerventions: Punishment, Mental Integrity, and Intentions.Peter Vallentyne - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):131-132.
Proportionality in the criminal law: The differing american versus canadian approaches to punishment.Roozbeh Baker - unknown
Treatment for Crime: Philosophical Essays on Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice.David Birks & Thomas Douglas (eds.) - 2018 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Introduction.Thomas Douglas & David Birks - 2018 - In David Birks & Thomas Douglas (eds.), Treatment for Crime: Philosophical Essays on Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nonconsensual Neurocorrectives and Bodily Integrity: a Reply to Shaw and Barn.Thomas Douglas - 2016 - Neuroethics 12 (1):107-118.
Intentions and Moral Permissibility: The Case of Acting Permissibly with Bad Intentions.S. Matthew Liao - 2012 - Law and Philosophy 31 (6):703-724.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-22

Downloads
16 (#880,136)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Thought Apprehension: The “True” Self and The Risks of Mind Reading.Andrea Lavazza - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (1):19-21.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Punishing Intentions and Neurointerventions.David Birks & Alena Buyx - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):133-143.

Add more references