An Aristotelian program for teaching argumentation


We have modified Aristotelian syllogistic logic in for use in introductory philosophy courses. Although the scope of Aristotle's syllogistic is narrowed by our modifications, its pedagogical value is increased in one crucial way: in 4-6 hours of class time, students with no background in argumentation progress to the point where they can evaluate the structure of condensed and extended arguments. Because the mechanics of the program are readily grasped, it is possible to focus class time on important, abstract notions such as validity, soundness, relevance, etc. If successfully implemented, the program encourages good habits for analysing, assessing and formulating arguments.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Formal Argument and Olympiodorus’ Development as a Plato-Commentator.Harold Tarrant - 2021 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 24 (1):210-241.
Teaching Argument Evaluation in An Introductory Philosophy Course.Jonathan Lavery & Jeff Mitscherling - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 43:67-74.
Building a High School Philosophy Program.Sean A. Riley - 2013 - Teaching Philosophy 36 (3):239-252.
Assessing an Elementary School Philosophy Program.Thomas Wartenberg - 2014 - Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children 20 (3-4):90-94.


Added to PP

5 (#1,562,871)

6 months
18 (#152,778)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references