The Rules of Trial, Political Morality and the Costs of Error: Or, Is Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt Doing More Harm than Good?

In Leslie Green & Brian Leiter (eds.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law: Volume 1. Oxford University Press (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Reasonable and the Relevant: Legal Standards of Proof.Georgi Gardiner - 2019 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 47 (3):288-318.
In Defence of Reasonable Doubt.Georgi Gardiner - 2017 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 34 (2):221-241.
Rethinking Criminal Law. [REVIEW]Andrew Botterell - 2009 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 22:93-112.
Gert on the Limits of Morality's Requirements.Dan W. Brock - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (2):435-440.
Gert on the Limits of Morality’s Requirements. [REVIEW]Dan W. Brock - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (2):435–440.
Fool-proof proofs of God.Frank B. Dilley - 1977 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 8 (1):18 - 35.
Applying the contribution principle.Christian Barry - 2005 - Metaphilosophy 36 (1-2):210-227.
Burden of Proof Rules in Social Criticism.Juha Räikkä - 1997 - Argumentation 11 (4):463-477.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-06-10

Downloads
3 (#1,519,925)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Larry Laudan
University of Texas at Austin

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references