Recognizing the Right Not to Know: Conceptual, Professional, and Legal Implications

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 42 (1):53-63 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article argues for the importance of conceptual clarity in the debate about the so-called right not to know. This is vital both at the theoretical and the practical level. It is suggested that, unlike many formulations and attempts to give effect to this right, what is at stake is not merely an aspect of personal autonomy and therefore cannot and should not be reduced only to a question of individual choice. Rather, it is argued that the core interests that can be protected by the right not to know are better conceived of as privacy interests rather than autonomy interests. This not only helps us to understand what is in play but also informs regulatory, professional, and legal responses to handling information and taking decisions about whether or not to disclose information to persons about themselves. The practical implications of this conceptualization are explored in the context of feedback policies in health-related research

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In Search of Core Values.W. Bradley Wendel - 2013 - Legal Ethics 16 (2):350-366.
Trial by slogan: Natural law and Lex iniusta non est Lex.S. J. - 2000 - Law and Philosophy 19 (4):433-449.
Biobank research and the right to privacy.Lars Øystein Ursin - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (4):267-285.
Ethics consultation and autonomy.Jukka Varelius - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (1):65-76.
Nurse Autonomy as Relational.Chris MacDonald - 2002 - Nursing Ethics 9 (2):194-201.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-29

Downloads
42 (#361,008)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?