Intimacy: a dialectical study

New York: Bloomsbury Academic, An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc/Bloomsbury (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An important contribution to the burgeoning field of the ethics of recognition, this book examines the contradictions inherent in the very concept of intimacy. Working with a wide variety of philosophical and literary sources, it warns against measuring our relationships against ideal standards, since there is no consummate form of intimacy. After analyzing ten major ways that we aim to establish intimacy with one another, including gift-giving, touching, and fetishes, the book concludes that each fails on its own terms, since intimacy wants something that is impossible. The very concept of intimacy is a superlative one; it aims not just for closeness, but for a closeness beyond closeness. Nevertheless, far from a pessimistic diagnosis of the human condition, this is a meditation on how to live intimately in a world in which intimacy is impossible. Rather than contenting itself with a deconstructive approach, it proposes to treat intimacy dialectically. For all its contradictions, it shows intimacy is central to how we understand ourselves and our relations to others.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,885

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-11

Downloads
15 (#1,314,653)

6 months
1 (#1,599,003)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christopher Lauer
University of Hawai'i at Hilo

Citations of this work

Ein Bett gestalten.Andreas Dorschel - 2020 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 68 (3):439-450.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references