Cavell’s Method

Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 9 (9) (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It may be time to question analytic philosophy’s structural ignorance of the methods of ordinary language philosophy. Cavell’s Must We Mean What We Say? upsets the analytic tradition to this end, pursuing a “linguistic phenomenology” that focuses on ordinary language use as a resource for describing the world. Cavell thereby entrusts the tradition with a more ambitious and concrete philosophical task.

Similar books and articles

Logic and Voice.Espen Hammer - 2021 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 9 (9).
Cavell's 'Must We Mean What We Say' at 50.Greg Chase, Juliet Floyd & Sandra Laugier (eds.) - 2022 - New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
A Radical Perfectionist: Revisiting Cavell in the Light of Kant.Alice Crary - 2014 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 48 (3):87-98.
On morality of speech: Cavell’s critique of Derrida. [REVIEW]Espen Dahl - 2011 - Continental Philosophy Review 44 (1):81-101.
Stanley Cavell’s Argument of the Ordinary.Avner Baz - 2018 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 7 (2):9-48.
Stanley Cavell, Religion, and Continental Philosophy.Espen Dahl - 2014 - Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-07

Downloads
102 (#167,048)

6 months
46 (#86,030)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sandra Laugier
Université paris 1

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophical papers.John Langshaw Austin - 1961 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by J. O. Urmson & G. J. Warnock.
Must we mean what we say?Stanley Cavell - 1964 - In Vere Claiborne Chappell (ed.), Ordinary language: essays in philosophical method. New York: Dover Publications. pp. 172 – 212.
The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind.Cora DIAMOND - 1991 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 100 (4):577-577.

View all 8 references / Add more references