Does controlling movement require intelligence?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (3):533-536 (1997)

Abstract

Motor control schemes should have an element of control and an element of coordination. The former is a source of initiative and a zroduct of the brain's work (mind, intelligence, or ) while the latter can be viewed as a process with constraints emerging at a hierarchically lower, autonomous level. Limiting scientific analysis to an object smaller than the universe necessarily leads to a hierarchical (cybernetic) approach

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,722

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
8 (#1,014,445)

6 months
3 (#198,250)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Natural Problems and Artificial Intelligence.Tracy B. Henley - 1990 - Behavior and Philosophy 18 (2):43-55.
Human Intelligence and Turing Test.Adam Drozdek - 1998 - AI and Society 12 (4):315-321.
Consciousness, Intentionality, and Intelligence: Some Foundational Issues for Artificial Intelligence.Murat Aydede & Guven Guzeldere - 2000 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 12 (3):263-277.
The Green Movement.Peggy J. Parks - 2011 - Referencepoint Press.
Controlling Access to the Internet: The Role of Filtering. [REVIEW]R. S. Rosenberg - 2001 - Ethics and Information Technology 3 (1):35-54.
Touching Intelligence.David Morris - 2002 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 29 (149-162):149-162.