Why ‘scaffolding’ is the wrong metaphor: the cognitive usefulness of mathematical representations

Synthese:1-14 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The metaphor of scaffolding has become current in discussions of the cognitive help we get from artefacts, environmental affordances and each other. Consideration of mathematical tools and representations indicates that in these cases at least, scaffolding is the wrong picture, because scaffolding in good order is immobile, temporary and crude. Mathematical representations can be manipulated, are not temporary structures to aid development, and are refined. Reflection on examples from elementary algebra indicates that Menary is on the right track with his ‘enculturation’ view of mathematical cognition. Moreover, these examples allow us to elaborate his remarks on the uniqueness of mathematical representations and their role in the emergence of new thoughts.

Other Versions

reprint Larvor, Brendan (2020) "Why ‘scaffolding’ is the wrong metaphor: the cognitive usefulness of mathematical representations". Synthese 197(9):3743-3756

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,826

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-27

Downloads
64 (#383,886)

6 months
18 (#213,247)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brendan Larvor
University of Hertfordshire

Citations of this work

The Tools of Enculturation.Richard Menary & Alexander Gillett - 2022 - Topics in Cognitive Science 14 (2):363-387.
A Pattern Theory of Scaffolding.Albert Newen & Regina E. Fabry - 2025 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 16 (1):65-90.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Mathematical Knowledge and the Interplay of Practices.José Ferreirós - 2015 - Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press.
The Euclidean Diagram.Kenneth Manders - 2008 - In Paolo Mancosu, The Philosophy of Mathematical Practice. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 80--133.

View all 11 references / Add more references