New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 13:306-317 (2014)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
The “battle” between corporealists and idealists described in Plato’s Sophist 245e6–249d5 is of significance for understanding the philosophical function of the dramatic exchange between the Eleatic guest and Theaetetus, the dialogue's main interlocutors. Various features of this exchange indicate that the Eleatic guest introduces and discusses the dispute between corporealists and idealists in order to educate Theaetetus in ontological matters. By reading the discussion between Theaetetus and the Eleatic guest in the light of these features, one comes to see that the primary audience for the proposal advanced by the Eleatic guest in this passage, namely that being is power, is not any of the participants in the “battle,” as has been commonly assumed, but Theaetetus himself—a fact to bear in mind in any viable interpretation of the passage.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Secret Doctrine and the Gigantomachia: Interpreting Plato’s Theaetetus-Sophist.Brad Berman - 2014 - Plato Journal 14:53-62.
Le sophiste et les exemples. Sur le problème de la ressemblance dans le "Sophiste" de Platon.Felipe Ledesma - 2009 - Revue de Philosophie Ancienne 27 (1):3-38.
What the Dialectician Discerns: A New Reading of Sophist 253d-E.Mitchell Miller - 2016 - Ancient Philosophy 36 (2):321-352.
Plato's "Theaetetus" and "Sophist": What False Sentences Are Not.George Hilding Rudebusch - 1982 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
"Logos," Knowledge, and Forms in Plato's "Theaetetus" and "Sophist".Kyung-hee Nam - 1982 - Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin
Form and Good in Plato's Eleatic Dialogues: The Parmenides, Theaetetus, Sophist, and Statesman.Kenneth Neil M. Dorter - unknown
Form and Good in Plato’s Eleatic Dialogues: The Parmenides, Theaetetus, Sophist, and Statesman. [REVIEW]Scott Berman - 1996 - Ancient Philosophy 16 (2):487-491.
Difference in Kind: Observations on the Distinction of the Megista Gene.David Ambuel - 2013 - In Beatriz Bossi & Thomas M. Robinson (eds.), Plato's Sophist Revisited. de Gruyter. pp. 247-268.
Kenneth Dorter, "Form and Good in Plato's Eleatic Dialogues: The "Parmenides," "Theaetetus," "Sophist," and "Statesman"". [REVIEW]David Ambuel - 1995 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 33 (4):679.
The Being of the Beautiful: Plato’s Theaetetus, Sophist, and Statesman. Plato - 1984 - University of Chicago Press.
Form and Good in Plato's Eleatic Dialogues the Parmenides, Theaetetus, Sophist, and Statesman.Kenneth Dorter - 1994 - University of California Press.
The Argument Against the Friends of the Forms Revisited: Sophist 248a4–249d5.Michael Wiitala - 2018 - Apeiron 51 (2):171-200.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2019-03-03
Total views
101 ( #114,438 of 2,498,792 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #50,815 of 2,498,792 )
2019-03-03
Total views
101 ( #114,438 of 2,498,792 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #50,815 of 2,498,792 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads