Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (12):877-881 (2008)

Abstract
Objectives: The mental health legislation of most developed countries includes either a dangerousness criterion or an obligatory dangerousness criterion (ODC). A dangerousness criterion holds that mentally ill people may be given treatment without consent if they are deemed to be a risk to themselves or others. An ODC holds that mentally ill people may be given treatment without consent only if they are deemed to be a risk to themselves or others. This paper argues that the dangerousness criterion is unnecessary, unethical and, in the case of the ODC, potentially harmful to mentally ill people and to the rest of the community. Methods: We examine the history of the dangerousness criterion, and provide reasoned argument and empirical evidence in support of our position. Results: Dangerousness criteria are not required to balance the perceived loss of autonomy arising from mental health legislation. Dangerousness criteria unfairly discriminate against the mentally ill, as they represent an unreasonable barrier to treatment without consent, and they spread the burden of risk that any mentally ill person might become violent across large numbers of mentally ill people who will never become violent. Mental health legislation that includes an ODC is associated with a longer duration of untreated psychosis, and probably contributes to a poorer prognosis and an increase risk of suicide and violence in patients in their first episode of psychosis. Conclusions: Dangerousness criteria should be removed from mental health legislation and be replaced by criteria that focus on a patient’s capacity to refuse treatment.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2008.025098
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,177
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Dangerousness, Mental Disorder, and Responsibility.J. R. McMillan - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (4):232-235.
Dangerousness and Mental Disorder.Nigel Walker - 1994 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 37:179-.
The Concept of Dangerousness.A. Norton - 1976 - Journal of Medical Ethics 2 (4):160-162.
Psychiatry and the Control of Dangerousness: A Comment.G. M. Sayers - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (4):235-236.
Review Essay / Sentencing by Sociology.Lois G. Forer - 1987 - Criminal Justice Ethics 6 (1):76-82.
Is Writing Good for Your Mental Health or Is There More to Life?Mary Nettle - 2010 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 17 (3):269-270.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-13

Total views
49 ( #229,410 of 2,499,668 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,789 of 2,499,668 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes