On paradoxes in naive set theory

Logique Et Analyse 32 (128):241-245 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Naïve set theory is innocent!A. Weir - 1998 - Mind 107 (428):763-798.
The Simple Consistency of Naive Set Theory using Metavaluations.Ross T. Brady - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (2-3):261-281.
A Robust Non-transitive Logic.Alan Weir - 2015 - Topoi 34 (1):1-9.
On the iterative explanation of the paradoxes.Christopher Menzel - 1986 - Philosophical Studies 49 (1):37 - 61.
Transfinite numbers in paraconsistent set theory.Zach Weber - 2010 - Review of Symbolic Logic 3 (1):71-92.
Problems with electoral evaluations of expert opinions.Roy A. Sorensen - 1984 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (1):47-53.
Definition Inclosed: A Reply to Zhong.Graham Priest - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (4):789 - 795.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-23

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jon Perez Laraudogoitia
University of the Basque Country

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references