More than provocative, less than scientific: A commentary on the editorial decision to publish Cofnas

Philosophical Psychology 33 (7):893-898 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This letter addresses the editorial decision to publish the article, “Research on group differences in intelligence: A defense of free inquiry” (Cofnas, 2020). Our letter points out several critical problems with Cofnas's article, which we believe should have either disqualified the manuscript upon submission or been addressed during the review process and resulted in substantial revisions.

Similar books and articles

Editorial.Christopher R. Stones - 2006 - Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology 6 (2):1-3.
Editorial Board Self-Publishing Rates in Czech Economic Journals.Radek Zdeněk - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (2):669-682.
Dual Use Research: Investigation Across Multiple Science Disciplines.Shannon Oltmann - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (2):327-341.


Added to PP

491 (#26,345)

6 months
72 (#23,964)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Rasmus Rosenberg Larsen
University of Toronto at Mississauga
Mark Alfano
Macquarie University
Massimo Pigliucci
CUNY Graduate Center
4 more

Citations of this work

To Be Scientific Is To Be Communist.Liam Kofi Bright & Remco Heesen - 2023 - Social Epistemology 37 (3):249-258.
Editor’s views.Mitchell Herschbach - 2020 - Philosophical Psychology 33 (7):899-901.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Editors’ note.Cees van Leeuwen & Mitchell Herschbach - 2020 - Philosophical Psychology 33 (1):148-150.

Add more references