Philosophical Psychology 33 (7):893-898 (2020)

Rasmus Rosenberg Larsen
University of Toronto at Mississauga
Mark Alfano
Macquarie University
Massimo Pigliucci
CUNY Graduate Center
4 more
This letter addresses the editorial decision to publish the article, “Research on group differences in intelligence: A defense of free inquiry” (Cofnas, 2020). Our letter points out several critical problems with Cofnas's article, which we believe should have either disqualified the manuscript upon submission or been addressed during the review process and resulted in substantial revisions.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09515089.2020.1805199
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Editors’ Note.Cees van Leeuwen & Mitchell Herschbach - 2020 - Philosophical Psychology 33 (1):148-150.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Editor’s Views.Mitchell Herschbach - 2020 - Philosophical Psychology 33 (7):899-901.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Editorial.Christopher R. Stones - 2006 - Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology 6 (2):1-3.
Editorial Board Self-Publishing Rates in Czech Economic Journals.Radek Zdeněk - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (2):669-682.
Dual Use Research: Investigation Across Multiple Science Disciplines.Shannon Oltmann - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (2):327-341.


Added to PP index

Total views
323 ( #31,681 of 2,498,168 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #33,539 of 2,498,168 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes