Differentiating philosopher from statesman according to work and worth

Polis 37 (3):550-566 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Plato’s Sophist and Statesman stand out from many other Platonic dialogues by at least two features. First, they do not raise a ti esti question about a single virtue or feature of something, but raise the questions what sophist, statesman, and philosopher are, how they differ from each other, and what worth each should be accorded. Second, a visitor from Elea, rather than Socrates, seeks to addressed these questions and does so by employing what is commonly referred to as the method of collection and division. Some scholars have argued that this so-called method is value neutral and therefore unable to address the question how philosophy differs from sophistry and statesmanship according to worth. This article contends that the procedures of collection and division does not preclude the visitor from taking considerations of worth into account, but rather helps establish an objective basis for settling the main questions of the dialogue.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles


Added to PP

770 (#21,609)

6 months
143 (#27,756)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Seeing Double.Jens Kristian Larsen - 2021 - Plato Journal 22.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references